A child’s death is a tragedy, but it’s not the end of it.
And when it happens to a child, it’s just another statistic in a growing body of data.
This is the case for a new research project, Children’s Mercy Hospital.
And it’s also the case with the work of a team of researchers who’ve been using the data from that tragedy to find solutions to the problem of children’s death in the criminal system.
In a study published in the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, a team led by the University of Michigan’s Michael Gannon, PhD, and Daniel Schulte, PhD analyzed the death of a child in a California hospital between 2006 and 2015.
That’s the year that California passed the Death with Dignity Act, which makes it a crime for a person to commit a crime that causes a child’s or a parent’s death.
The law was first proposed in the 1970s, and it’s still on the books today.
It’s also one of the biggest impediments to reforming the criminal-justice system, Gannon said.
It’s hard to overstate the magnitude of this tragedy.
It happened in an affluent, well-educated, middle-class community, where children are seen as a social pariah, and this young child died of a medical condition that was likely caused by the trauma of the trauma, the researchers wrote.
In their analysis, Gansons and Schultes found that in about half of the cases they analyzed, the death was caused by neglect.
That means the child was not adequately cared for in the care of the medical facility or in the family, which is a common problem in the system.
The authors also noted that in the cases that were not reported to the authorities, it was often hard to identify if the children were experiencing the effects of abuse or neglect.
This meant the children often were neglected by adults who were not aware of the situation and who might not have known what to do if they were, according to Ganson.
So, in addition to being a tragedy for the families, the authors found that the deaths could be misused to justify harsh punishments for criminals, even when the children involved were not at risk, Gannon said.
The childrens deaths were used as justification for the death penalty.
“This is an opportunity to get our collective minds around how we can make sure that the system that we’ve got isn’t going to be used in ways that are detrimental to the families of these children,” Gannon told Business Insider.
That’s because it’s very hard to know what a child can or cannot experience, and the impact of neglect can vary depending on the severity of the condition.
And the childrens death can be used as a justification for an unfair and disproportionate punishment of someone else, Gancher said.
“What is very important to understand is that it is not just about the person who died, but the children that are impacted by that,” Gancer said.
“So it is possible that this is not an isolated incident.”
The authors of the study found that there were a few factors that may help to explain the disparity in how the data is reported in the media and the criminal laws that are in place.
The majority of the deaths were due to neglect, so children were not being cared for, said Gannon.
And, of course, the children who died were under 18 at the time of the incident, so it was a young child who died.
The researchers also found that many children who experienced neglect were treated as less important, with fewer privileges, and had more privileges taken away than those who were neglected.
That could be because the police, social workers, and court officials didn’t care enough to keep track of the children and families that had suffered, and those children weren’t considered as a group, Gangan said.
There are two major areas that the researchers examined to address the disparity.
First, it can be helpful to examine the impact on the families when the child is reported to authorities.
That is, what happened to the child can be a reason for the family not to press charges, and why the person responsible for the child’s mistreatment is not held accountable, Gano said.
Secondly, the research suggests that some children who are reported to be in the custody of the state have an unfair advantage because they are considered less important than those with whom the child shares custody, which may affect how the justice system is adjudicated.
“We think that there are several factors that are contributing to that, and we also think that we need to do something about that,” he said.
That can mean, for example, a child is not getting the same privileges that their parents are, or that they’re not being considered as equal members of the family.
“We’re trying to figure out how to deal with those issues,” Gano added.
For Gancerg, the goal is to make sure the criminal code